RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00915
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be permitted to initiate a four year contact for Aviator
Retention Pay (ARP) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 with initial
eligibility and start date of 1 February 2013.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The delayed release of the Air National Guard (ANG) FY 2013 ARP
policy guidance only makes him eligible for the smaller incentive
rate valued at $15,000 per year, pro-rated for 43 months instead
of an incentive rate of $25,000 per year for 48 months. The FY
2013 ARP program, unlike the FY 2012 Aviator Continuation Pay
(ACP) program, does not allow for back-dating of contracts to the
date of orders issued, nor does it allow extending current orders
for those members on probationary tours.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal
statement, copies of his FY 2013 ARP Agreement Statement of
Understanding (SOU), orders, ANG FY 2013 Implementation Policy, FY
2012 Pilot ACP Agreement SOU, memorandums and various other
documents related to his request.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to Special Order A-X000122 dated 22 January 2013, the
applicant was ordered to active duty from 1 February 2013 through
31 January 2017.
The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard (ANG)
in the grade of major.
On 12 May 14, the Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF) denied relief
to two applicants making similar arguments to the AFBCMR. Her
memorandum stated, in part, that Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP)
is an incentive program, not an entitlement. The intent of
Congress (and therefore the purpose of the statute) was to provide
an incentive that would encourage aviation service officers not to
leave active duty. Backdating an ACP agreement essentially offers
an incentive to an officer for a decision he has already made and
provides a retention bonus for a period of service already served.
Doing so would depart from the purpose of the statute.
Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in
any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any
delay in approval for the program for a given year cannot become
the basis for a retroactive recovery (Exhibit C).
On 27 June 2014, the AFBCMR staff forwarded the applicant a copy
of the noted SECAF decision for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PF recommends denial. The ANG FY 2013 ARP policy was
delayed until 7 June 2013, delaying the submission of his
application resulting in orders that did not cover the entire
period of the requested agreement. ARP is a retention bonus,
which by nature is an incentive intended to modify an officer's
future conduct. Regrettably, it is not possible to execute an
incentive for past conduct, therefore backdating ARP agreements is
not in keeping with Congressional intent as authorized by 37 U.S.
Code § 334 - Special Aviation Incentive Pay and Bonus Authorities
for Officers. The applicant did not have sufficient time
remaining on his orders to support a 4-year ANG FY 2013 ARP
Agreement. He was on an Initial Tour order from 1 February
2013 through 31 January 2017. In accordance with ANGI 36-101, Air
National Guard Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program, chapter 6,
paragraph 6.1, this order is considered probationary. Paragraph
2.2.1 of the ANG FY 2013 ARP Policy states that members on
probationary tours must have orders in hand that cover the entire
length of the agreement at the time of their application. The
applicant was eligible for a FY 2013 ARP Agreement that covers the
period 7 June 2013 through 31 January 2017 at a rate of
$15,000 per year which he is currently receiving.
The complete copy of the A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 27 June 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the
rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant
has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 12 February 2015, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2014-
00915 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 February 2014, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1PF dated 7 May 2014.
Exhibit C. Letters, Secretary of the Air Force, dated
12 May 2014.
Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 June 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00960
Backdating an ACP agreement essentially offers an incentive to an officer for a decision he has already made and provides a retention bonus for a period of service already served. Paragraph 2.2.1 of the ANG FY13 ARP Policy states that members on probationary tours must have orders in hand that cover the entire length of the agreement at the time of their application. The applicant was eligible for a FY13 ARP Agreement that covers the period 7 Jun 13 through 31 Jan 17 at $15,000 per year...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00616
We note that in light of the SecAFs decision to deny relief to two applicants making similar arguments to the Board, the Air Force OPR recommended the applicants request be denied. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00946
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) eligibility date of 7 Jun 13 be changed to 1 Feb 13 to make him eligible for a four-year Air National Guard (ANG) Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 ARP Agreement. Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03760
According to the FY 2013 ANG ARP Policy, paragraph 2.1.7, each aviator must: Be eligible for at least two continuous years of full time duty upon acceptance of an ARP Agreement." We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; and note the Air Force office of primary responsibilitys recommendation to grant the applicants request because the release of the FY 2013 ARP Policy was delayed until 7 June 2013. Exhibit G. Letters, Secretary of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01030
Backdating an ACP agreement essentially offers an incentive to an officer for a decision he has already made and provides a retention bonus for a period of service already served. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03608
Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any delay in approval of the program for a given year cannot become the basis for a retroactive recovery. The complete SecAF decision is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends denial. Upon further review of the documents provided, A1PF concludes he should be permitted to request,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03832 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His initial eligibility and start date for Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) be 11 Feb 13. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The delayed release of the Air National Guard (ANG) Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 ARP policy guidance resulted in his not being allowed to renew his two-year ARP agreement. A complete copy of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00475
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00475 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) contract be changed to reflect he is on a four-year Air Guard Reserve (AGR) tour. Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any delay in approval of the program for a given year cannot become the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05602
The intent of Congress (and therefore the purpose of the statute) was to provide an incentive that would encourage aviation service officers not to leave active duty. Upon review of his application, A1PF concluded that he should be permitted to adjust the effective date of his current FY13 ARP agreement from 27 Aug 13 to 2 Feb 13. However, in view of the fact the Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) has determined that any delay in the approval of the ARP program for a given year cannot...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03525
Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any delay in approval of the program for a given year cannot become the basis for a retroactive recovery. On 12 Jul 14, SAF/MRBR forwarded the applicant copies of the noted SecAF decisions for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit I). APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 11 Mar 14, the applicant requested his application be re-opened....